main title
Reverand Ron: Enlightened Spiritual Master

Reverand Ron: Enlightened Spiritual Master

17. Life before and after death

Traditional Christianity promotes the idea of life after death. It tells us if we are good we live in Heaven with God. And if we are bad we go to hell. That’s the basic format of traditional Christianity.

There are other religions that promote their ideas of Heaven and hell. We also have the concept of reincarnation. There are any number of new age religion books that discuss life after death and previous lives and what it’s like to have a near death experience.

These ideas have one thing in common. We are unable to verify them through any kind of accepted scientific proof. It’s all speculation and I can only speculate on these ideas from my personal experiences. My first idea on previous lives and life after death is they don’t matter, even if they are true. From a practical standpoint how many of us remember anything that happened before the age of five? That was in effect another life, because most of us don’t remember anything about it. I’ll go back even further to make my point. How many of us remember anything about our time in the womb? Those examples have to do with this life and we don’t remember anything about them. So how are we to remember anything about previous lives and the life we have now if there is life after death? I also had two near death experiences. One of them was an automobile accident and the other one was a bicycle accident. The only thing I remember about them was waking up in intensive care. Now maybe if I would have died I would have gone on to another life, but then I wouldn’t be here trying to explain all of this and make sense of it. Reincarnation makes even less sense. I have no idea how reincarnation ever gained any creditability.

A Course in Miracles explains it differently. From a Course perspective there is no life after death because there is no death. This world is only an illusion, a dream, from which we eventually wake up. A Course in Miracles also has two pages on reincarnation in the manual for teachers, pages 60 and 61, which I have reproduced below.

24. IS REINCARNATION SO?

In the ultimate sense, reincarnation is impossible. There is no past or future, and the idea of birth into a body has no meaning either once or many times. Reincarnation cannot, then, be true in any real sense. Our only question should be, “Is the concept helpful?” And that depends, of course, on what it is used for. If it is used to strengthen the recognition of the eternal nature of life, it is helpful indeed. Is any other question about it really useful in lighting up the way? Like many other beliefs, it can be bitterly misused. At least, such misuse offers preoccupation and perhaps pride in the past. At worst, it induces inertia in the present. In between, many kinds of folly are possible.

Reincarnation would not, under any circumstances, be the problem to be dealt with now. If it were responsible for some of the difficulties the individual faces now, his task would still be only to escape from them now. If he is laying the groundwork for a future life, he can still work out his salvation only now. To some, there may be comfort in the concept, and if it heartens them its value is self-evident. It is certain, however, that the way to salvation can be found by those who believe in reincarnation and by those who do not. The idea cannot, therefore, be regarded as essential to the curriculum. There is always some good in any thought which strengthens the idea that life and the body are not the same.

For our purposes, it would not be helpful to take any definite stand on reincarnation. A teacher of God should be as helpful to those who believe in it as to those who do not. If a definite stand were required of him, it would merely limit his usefulness, as well as his own decision making. Our course is not concerned with any concept that is not acceptable to anyone, regardless of his formal beliefs. His ego will be enough for him to cope with, and it is not the part of wisdom to add sectarian controversies to his burdens. Nor would there be an advantage in his premature acceptance of the course merely because it advocates a long-held belief of his own.

It cannot be too strongly emphasized that this course aims at a complete reversal of thought. When this is finally accomplished, issues such as the validity of reincarnation become meaningless. Until then, they are likely to be merely controversial. The teacher of God is, therefore, wise to step away from all such questions, for he has much to teach and learn apart from them. He should both learn and teach that theoretical issues but waste time, draining it away from its appointed purpose. If there are aspects to any concept of belief that will be helpful, he will be told about it. He will also be told how to use it. What more need he know?

Does this mean that the teacher of God should not believe in reincarnation himself, or discuss it with others who do? The answer is, certainly not! If he does believe in reincarnation, it would be a mistake for him to renounce the belief unless his internal Teacher so advised. And this is most unlikely. He might be advised that he is misusing the belief in some way that is detrimental to his pupil’s advance or his own. Reinterpretation would then be recommended, because it is necessary. All that must be recognized, however, is that birth was not the beginning, and death is not the end. Yet even this much is not required of the beginner. He need merely accept the idea that what he knows is not necessarily all there is to learn. His journey has begun.

The emphasis of this course always remains the same; it is at this moment that complete salvation is offered you, and it is at this moment that you can accept it. This is still your one responsibility. Atonement might be equated with total escape from the past and total lack of interest in the future. Heaven is here. There is nowhere else. Heaven is now. There is no other time. No teaching that does not lead to this is of concern to God’s teachers. All beliefs will point to this if properly interpreted. In this sense, it can be said that their truth lies in their usefulness. All beliefs that lead to progress should be honored. This is the sole criterion this course requires. No more than this is necessary

That’s what Helen Schucman wrote. It’s much better than the traditional religious beliefs about life after death. I’ll give you an example. We send people to fight and die for their country. We send traditional religious leaders with them to give them encouragement in the hope of eternal life if they are killed. If people were encouraged instead to believe only in the present, war would cease overnight, because no one would be willing to give up their one and only life in a government and church sponsored war. People everywhere would see the folly of believing in a past that is gone and a future that doesn’t exist.

There are also people dabbling in so-called past lives and past life regression. The only thing I have to say about that is it usually involves the exchange of money, sometimes a lot of it, in return for someone telling you about your past life. That sort of nonsense should be avoided at all cost.

RR-ESM

Top of Page

Reverand Ron: Enlightened Spiritual Master